Glaze v. Lemaster
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Justice.
After executor Eric Lemaster propounded the will of Lillie Payne, George Glaze filed a caveat contending, inter alia, that the will was invalid because it was not properly executed, that Payne lacked the requisite testamentary capacity and that the will was not freely and voluntarily executed. After a bench trial the probate court rejected the caveat and found the will to be valid. Because the evidence adduced supports the probate court’s judgment, we affirm.
1. Appellant contends that the will was not properly executed because Payne did not follow the procedure set forth in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Ashford v. Van HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Shewmake v. ShewmakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Fletcher v. EllenburgSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Miles v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cruver v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In Re Estate of LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Amerson v. PahlSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- In the Interest of M. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Tuttle v. RyanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.