Legal Opinion

Krumm v. El Reno State Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 1921No. 10292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court. Canadian County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action on note by the El Reno State Bank against C. H. Krumm and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant named brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KANE. J.

This was an action upon a promissory note, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against J. I. Denni-son. as principal, and the plaintiff in error C. H. Krumm. as surety.

The petition was in the usual form, and admittedly stated a cause of action. The answer was; (1) A general denial; (2) that said note was executed and delivered by the maker thereof to the plaintiff long before the defendant, Krumm. indorsed his name thereon, and that said indorsement was made at the special instance and request of the plaintiff and for the benefit of the plain tiff, and was made…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Thomas v. HoebelIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Harris v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API