Legal Opinion

Hamann v. Sumichrast

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1991No. 2-91-0248PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Unverzagt

Plaintiffs, Walter Hamann and Lila Hamann, appeal from the judgment of the circuit court of Lake County finding that the subdivision in which plaintiffs reside is not a common-law subdivision and that the Lake Forest zoning ordinance pertaining to the 20,000-square-foot minimum lot size requirement for single-family residences is not unconstitutional as applied to their lot. Additionally, plaintiffs appeal from that portion of the judgment rendering moot the issue of whether Lake Forest’s lot-in-depth subdivision section of the zoning ordinance is reasonable as applied to plaintiffs’ lot.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Zearing v. RaberIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Gerstley v. Globe Wernicke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bond v. DunmireAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Glenview State Bank v. Village of DeerfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tim Thompson, Inc. v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. In Re NitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. ROCKFORD BLACKTOP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. County of BooneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. State Bank of Countryside v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Hess v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API