Legal Opinion

Vanderpool v. La Crosse & Milwaukee Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from tlie Circuit Court for Juneau County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Jnstiee Taylok, in bis opinion as originally prepared: “This action was commenced on the 7th day of July, 1858, against the railroad company, the present appellant, and L. B. Bloomer.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from tlie Circuit Court for Juneau County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Jnstiee Taylok, in bis opinion as originally prepared: “This action was commenced on the 7th day of July, 1858, against the railroad company, the present appellant, and L. B. Bloomer. The plaintiffs in their complaint claimed that the defendant Bloomer was contractor for the construction of a railroad bridge for the railroad company; that the plaintiff's, as subcontractors, had furnished a large amount of timber and lumber to said contractor, which was intended for and was used by said contractor in the…

1Opinion of the Court

Tatloe, <L

The respondents claim that the present judgment should be affirmed, notwithstanding the decision of this court upon the writ of error from the first judgment, upon the sole ground that, after the decision upon the former judgment and before judgment was again rendered on October 27,1863, the legislature passed oh. 215, Laws of 1861, entitled, “An act *657to amend ch. 153 of the revised statutes,‘entitled, ‘Of the lien of mechanics and others.’ ” After the enacting clause, the following is the whole of the chapter: “ Section 1. The provisions of ch. 153 of the revised statutes, entitled,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dash v. Van KleeckNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Satterlee v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Ogden, Administrator of Cornell v. Blackledge, of SalterSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  4. People Ex Rel. Peake v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Inhabitants of Medford v. LearnedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis & Starr Lumber Co. v. PorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. BashfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Quinn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Boorman v. Juneau CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API