People v. Waldorf System Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The evidence failed to establish that the defendant’s possession of the impure food was for the purpose of sale in that condition, in violation of section 163 of the Sanitary Code. (People v. Woolworth Co., 250 App. Div. 864; People v. Woolworth Co., 246 id. 838.) Possession, without intent to sell, is not included in the ordinance. (People v. Timmerman, 79 App. Div. 565; affd., 179 N. Y. 550.) In the present case any presumption of intent to sell arising from the possession of the impure food (Sanitary Code, art. 9, § 138*), was successfully repelled by the defendant’s proof.
The judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. TimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- People v. . TimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Philip Lewis Egg Products, Inc.New York City Magistrates' Court · 1949
- People v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945