Legal Opinion

Med-Care Associates, Inc. v. Noot

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1983No. C5-81-1204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

The issue raised by this appeal is whether the Commissioner of Public Welfare (Commissioner) properly applied the rate limitation statute, Minn.Stat. § 256B.45, subd. 3 (1982), to the Medicaid reimbursement paid to Med-Care Associates, Inc. (Med-Care) for nursing home services. The trial court held that the grandfather clause amendment prohibits the statute’s application in this case and that the Commissioner had wrongfully limited Medicaid reimbursements to Med-Care. We reverse.

Prior to 1976, the Medicaid program, through the Department of Public Welfare, reimbursed in full…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tilleny v. KnoblauchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Bergstein v. BergquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Panola County Appraisal Review Board v. Pepper, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  2. Camelot LLC v. Amc Showplace Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Unity Investors Ltd. Partnership v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API