Legal Opinion

Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 12, 2004No. 02-56722Published

1Opinion of the Court

358 F.3d 616

Christopher MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

YOKOHAMA TIRE CORPORATION, a California corporation; Stephen L. Kessing; James MacMaster; Rick Brennan; Philip L. Siracuse; Chikara

Cheech Yamauchi; Highway Performance Company, Limited, a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-56722.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted November 3, 2003 — Pasadena, California.

Filed January 12, 2004.

William L. Zeltonoga and Richard Ross, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Don A. Proudfoot, Jr., James H. Broderick, Jr., and Benjamin E. Goldman, Squire,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API