Legal Opinion

People v. Slim

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 1987No. 86—1497PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pincham

After a bench trial, the defendant, Willie Slim, was found guilty of armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2(a)) and was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. His sole contention on appeal is that the victim’s single identification testimony of him as the robber was wrought with inconsistencies, was not clear and convincing and failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was the robber. The defendant insists that his conviction should therefore be reversed.

The Supreme Court of the United States in vacating the defendant’s robbery conviction in United…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. The People v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. AshIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. MarshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. People v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SlimIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. GrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. People v. ZambranoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API