Anaya v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Manoukian, J.,
with whom Thompson, J., joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
In the instant case, Benito Anaya appeals from revocation of his probation contending that the admission of hearsay evidence violated his right to confrontation and that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his probation. Although I concur in that part of the majority opinion which holds that the trial court erred when it ruled that Anaya had waived his sixth *126amendment confrontation right, I disagree that the error is reversible within the context of this case.
The effect of the majority opinion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Ross Joseph StradaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- State v. RiddellWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- United States v. Robert Lee Miller, A/K/A Charles W. RavenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.