Legal Opinion

Armora (Freddy) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2013No. 62576Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

as guidelines and the "[fl allure to adhere to the standards does not, in and of itself, constitute ineffective assistance of counsel"). We disagree with Armora's contention. "A district court may, in its discretion, grant a defendant's [presentence] motion to withdraw a guilty plea for any substantial reason if it is fair and just." Woods v. State, 114 Nev. 468, 475,

958 P.2d 91, 95

(1998) (internal quotations omitted). At the hearing on his motion, Armora's former counsel testified that although he was unable to accept collect telephone calls from inmates, he did in fact meet several times…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Molina v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Woods v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API