Legal Opinion

Phinney v. Chesebro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Horace C. Phinney and another against Denison P. Chesebro and another. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

The defendants were the owners of a piece of property in the city of New York, upon which they were erecting a building to be used as a hotel. They placed this property in the hands of several real estate brokers to be leased or sold. The plaintiffs, as brokers, negotiated a lease of the building to Mr. Knott for 15 years at a rental of $9,250 a year, and for negotiating this lease the plaintiffs were paid by the defendants their commission, amounting to $1,387.50. At the time the property was placed in the plaintiffs’ hands the defendants had authorized them to either procure a purchaser of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Freedman v. HavemeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Hay v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wheelan v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Schmidt v. UngrichAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API