Legal Opinion
Buras v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 3, 1941No. 36050PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Justice.
Plaintiffs instituted this suit against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, surety on the bonds furnished by Priest, Montagnet & Roshlco, Inc., as a real estate broker under the provisions of Act No. 236 of 1920, to recover the sum of $1,250, with interest and attorney fees, alleged to have been paid by them to the said corporation in pursuance of- a contract for the purchase of real estate, which was never delivered to them.
For cause of action plaintiffs alleged in effect that in the years 1927, 1928, and 1929, Priest, Montagnet & Roshlco, Inc., was licensed and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ford v. Delta & Pine Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Succession of BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Saint v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Thibaut v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- City of Shreveport v. GregorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- State v. BurnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- State v. AndersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Regional Urology, LLC v. PriceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Priest v. CoverdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.