Legal Opinion
Cole v. CALIFORNIA INS. GUAR. ASS'N
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 2004No. B172631PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
18 Cal.Rptr.3d 801 (2004)
122 Cal.App.4th 552
Jocelyn COLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Defendant and Respondent.
No. B172631.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven.
September 20, 2004.
Rehearing Denied October 5, 2004.
Review Denied January 12, 2005.
Plotkin, Marutani & Kaufman, Jay J. Plotkin, Nancy Marutani and Warren W. Kaufman, Sherman Oaks, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Lord, Bissell & Brook, C. Guerry Collins, William S. Davis and Tom K. Ara, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.
ZELON, J.
This appeal raises a question of first impression:…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Dep't of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. v. Reliance Insurance Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005