Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 2010No. 2010 CA 0583PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKline, J.

12This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of a claimant whose money was seized on belief that it was subject to forfeiture in connection with an alleged drug transaction. After a trial on the merits, the trial court ordered the State to return the seized funds. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 13, 2008, Nevelle Holder Bell, Sr. was driving a rented vehicle on Interstate 12 when he was stopped by a state trooper for changing lanes without a signal. While Mr. Bell’s vehicle was being searched, a narcotics detection dog…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. ODECO Oil & Gas Co. v. NunezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. State v. Property Seized From Terrance MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. State v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. $144,320.00 Tina BeersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  2. State v. 2002 Chevrolet Trail BlazerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. State v. BoydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. State v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API