Roar v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
Statement of the Case
Victor Roar appeals his conviction for intimidation, as a Class A misdemean- or, following a bench trial. Roar presents two issues for our review:
1. Whether 'the State presented sufficient evidence to show that he communicated a threat with the intent to place his victim in fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act; and
2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in the admission of certain evidence.
We.hold that the State presented sufficient evidence from which a reasonable fact-finder could conclude that Roar had committed intimidation, and we are not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoglund v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Marq Hall v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Casey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Joshua McCaine Pillow v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harold E. Chastain v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Victor Roar v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Robert R. Fleming v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Lance E. Brown v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Blake Patrick Hansen v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.