Renner v. President of the Bank of Columbia
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson
This case, comes up on á writ of error to the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia; and by the record it appears, that the action in the Court below was prosecuted against Renner, the plaintiff in error, as en< orscr of a promissory note, drawn by James Foyles, and discounted at the Bank of Columbia. The note bears date on the 9th day of January, 1817, for 4600 dollars, *583and is payable sixty days after date. In the declaration it is.averred, that demand of payment of the njaker was made on the 14th of March, which , was on the fourth day after the éxpiration of the sixty days, which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- President, Directors, & Co. v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Halsey v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809
- Weston v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1838
3Cited by22 opinions
- Independent Milk Producers Co-Op v. StoffelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Marion County ProsecutorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- (PC) Dillingham v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Justus v. DelacruzDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Martinez v. BrandonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.