Legal Opinion

Renner v. President of the Bank of Columbia

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1824PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

This case, comes up on á writ of error to the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia; and by the record it appears, that the action in the Court below was prosecuted against Renner, the plaintiff in error, as en< orscr of a promissory note, drawn by James Foyles, and discounted at the Bank of Columbia. The note bears date on the 9th day of January, 1817, for 4600 dollars, *583and is payable sixty days after date. In the declaration it is.averred, that demand of payment of the njaker was made on the 14th of March, which , was on the fourth day after the éxpiration of the sixty days, which the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. President, Directors, & Co. v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  3. Halsey v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809
  4. Weston v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1838

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Independent Milk Producers Co-Op v. StoffelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Marion County ProsecutorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. (PC) Dillingham v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC) Justus v. DelacruzDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Martinez v. BrandonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API