Legal Opinion
State v. DANIEL T.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 12, 2003No. 03-1189PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOOVER, PJ.
¶ 1. Daniel T. appeals a disposi-tional order and a subsequent order lifting a stay on the requirement that Daniel register as a sex offender pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 301.45. Daniel contends that the trial court erred when it concluded it had no authority to impose the stay. We conclude that the trial court lacks the authority to stay sex offender registration under § 301.45. Thus, it was appropriate for the trial court to lift the stay and the order is affirmed.
Background
¶ 2. The facts are undisputed. A delinquency petition was filed against Daniel on September 30, 2002, alleging…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. KENDELL G.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Nicolet Minerals Co. v. Town of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- JUNEAU COUNTY DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES v. James B.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Interest of Cesar G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004