Legal Opinion
Upham & Gordon v. Allen
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from the Linn Circuit Court. — Hon. W. W. Rucker, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs now complain that the opinion evinces a misapprehension of the evidence by us. In referring to the suppletory agreement of September 23 we said:
“It is plain that the mortgagees in the second and third mortgages were thereby placed in a joint and common possession of said mortgaged property with *207those named in the first. Ellis was no more than an agent for all the mortgagees. He turned over the possession to Eox with the acquiescence of the mortgagees. The latter was but the agent. * * * His possession was that of all the mortgagees.”
In the plaintiffs’…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Griffin v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Gray v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Kennedy v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Pulliam v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Davis v. WarfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Seay v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Steckman v. Galt State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Colean Manufacturing Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Butler v. BoyntonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Whitecotton v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.