Ridgway v. Mirkovich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a previous order vacating the satisfaction of judgment hereinafter considered.
A question is made as to whether notice of the motion for the’ first order was properly served upon defendant. That and other subordinate and procedural questions need not be considered, for, on the merits, decision must be for defendant.
Plaintiff procured a judgment for upwards of $160 against defendant some time before December 30, 1929. On that day she caused certain land of which defendant was the owner to be sold under a writ of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holtzinger v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- First National Bank v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Kinports v. OberiioltzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Sedgwick v. JackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900