Legal Opinion

Crystal Ice Co. v. United Surety Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1909No. Docket No. 175PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Debt by the Crystal Ice Company, Limited, against the United Surety Company for the amount of a bond. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

The action in this case was brought by plaintiff on a surety bond executed by defendant company to plaintiff June 1,1906, insuring plaintiff, for the term of one year, to the amount of $500, against loss sustained by the larceny or embezzlement of a certain employé while in plaintiff’s employ as a collector The surety bond was renewed for another year by a renewal certificate. On December 24, 1907, while this bond continued in force, the employé confessed to Mr. Osborne, secretary of plaintiff company, that he had not returned money of plaintiff collected by him, to the amount of $96.98. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burnham v. Interstate Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People ex rel. T. B. Townsend Brick & Contracting Co. v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Scottish Union & National Ins. Co. v. BejcyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Wisconsin Michigan Power Co. v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Shafer v. United States Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. City of Topeka v. Federal Union Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API