Legal Opinion

People v. Kirkland

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1996PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the case remitted to that Court for consideration of the facts (see, CPL 470.25 [2] [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]).

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree and two counts of petit larceny. Defendant was sentenced to two to four years’ imprisonment on each felony count and one year on each misdemeanor count, with all of the terms to run concurrently.

Prior to trial, defendant moved to preclude identification evidence on the ground that the People provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. WitherspoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. BorthwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Jelinek v. CostelloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. People v. DriscollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. VelazquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API