Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Horne

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM GILES. Appeal from the Chancery Court of 'Giles County.— Waltek S. Bearden, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The complainants, Mrs. Hancock and Mrs. Wood, and the defendant Oscar ITorne, were the owners of four hundred and forty-three acres of land lying in Giles county, this State. The two complainants, sisters of the defendant, owned each a one-seventh undivided interest, and the defendant owned the remaining five-sevenths, one-seventh by inheritance, and the residue by purchase from other coheirs. At the death of their mother these parties, complainants and defendant, desired to sell the land for the purpose of dividing the proceeds. The two complainants lived out West; Mrs. Hancock in Oklahoma,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. . CountrymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Montgomery Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Keith v. KellamUnited States Circuit Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNeill v. Dobson-Bainbridge, Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API