Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Big Bend Quarry Co. v. Wurdeman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 3, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

The relator filed a petition in this court seeking to prohibit respondent, Judge of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, from proceeding with, an action wherein the State of Missouri was plaintiff, and the Big Bend Quarry Company, relator, was defendant. By stipulation filed in this court February 18, 1925, the service of preliminary rule in prohibition was waived, and respondent filed his return. Thereupon, March 24, 1925, the relator filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the return of respondent did not set up' facts sufficient to show why an absolute rule of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frear v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Gathings v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Burroughs v. WellingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Adderton v. CollierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  5. Oberlander v. ConfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Krisman v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Smith v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Pioneer Cooperage Co. v. Bland and Foster.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 42 v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Gehrs v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API