Bancroft Drainage District v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal, from the district court for Cuming county: Anson. A. Welch, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Cuming county to recover an assessment against the defendant. Prom a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor, the defendant has appealed.
The defendant concedes that the organization of the district was regular, and contests the validity of the assessment, upon two grounds: That the apportionment of benefits against the defendant .was invalid because *457of the insufficiency of the notice of the action of the board in apportioning the benefits; and because the assessment was not certified to the county clerk and spread upon the tax list of that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leavitt v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Lawson v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Mciver v. Florida Central & Peninsular RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Railroad v. BentzTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Ainlay v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chilen v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Prucka v. Eastern Sarpy Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Scottsbluff Drainage District v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Fleming v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- In re Buckeye Pipe Line Co.New Jersey Special Statutory Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.