Legal Opinion
In Re Kortz
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 27, 2002No. 19-60287PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT AND SANCTIONS
MARILYN SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on June 26, 2002 on the Debtors’ Motion for sanctions for repeated violations of the automatic stay 1 (the “Motion”) filed on May 13, 2002 against ditech.com. 2 Participating in the evidentiary hearing were the Debtors, Jeffrey and Sandra Kortz, and their counsel Morris Laatsch. No representative from ditech.com appeared for the hearing. 3 During the hearing the Court received evidence in the form of exhibits and the testimony of the Debtors.
This proceeding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In the Matter of Mobile Steel Company, Debtor. Elaine E. Benjamin v. Lester Y. Diamond, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mobile Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Edith Bloom, M.D., Debtor. William A. Goichman v. Edith Bloom, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re John Rothwell Knaus, Debtor. John Rothwell Knaus v. Concordia Lumber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Kansas City Journal-Post Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Wilkinson v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re PervizUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- In Re BivensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Caffey v. Russell (In Re Caffey)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2008
- Farinash v. Henry, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Henry v. CaseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022