Legal Opinion
Heltz v. Barratt
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 2014PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order af*1187firmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
2Cited by32 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. TricaricoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Foley v. SantucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Choo v. Virginia Transp. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Penda v. DuvallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Martinez v. CoferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.