Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 6, 1990No. 89-K-0037, 89-K-0038PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

574 So.2d 330 (1990)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Antonio A. ROMERO and Jesusa N. Romero.

Nos. 89-K-0037, 89-K-0038.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 1990.

Rehearing Denied September 13, 1990.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Cynthia Killingsworth, Glen Petersen, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.

Thomas Lorenzi, Godwin, Roddy, Lorenzi, Watson & Sanchez, Clifford Newman, Newman, Thibodeaux & Marshall, Lake Charles, Skipper Drost, Sulphur, for Antonio and Jesusa Romero.

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Defendant physicians, Dr. Antonio Romero and Dr. Jesusa Romero, were charged with sixty-seven and thirty-three…

Also in this document: Dissent · Calogero; Dissent · Watson; Dissent · Lemmon.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. KaheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. State v. NuccioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. StamperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. State v. DubrocLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. State v. OwensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. State v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. State v. BarnesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API