Bio-Medial Applications of Tennessee, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEON JORDAN, District Judge.
Now before the court are: “Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record” [doc. 42]; defendant’s “Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaim” [doc. 44]; and plaintiffs “Motion for Summary Judgment” [doc. 47]. The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for the court’s consideration. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion will be granted and defendant’s motions will be denied.
I
Background
Plaintiff operates a kidney dialysis center and is the assignee of the retiree health care benefits of a now-deceased patient (“the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF GA. v. City of DaltonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009