Legal Opinion

Bio-Medial Applications of Tennessee, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 13, 2009No. 3:08-cv-00228PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEON JORDAN, District Judge.

Now before the court are: “Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record” [doc. 42]; defendant’s “Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaim” [doc. 44]; and plaintiffs “Motion for Summary Judgment” [doc. 47]. The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for the court’s consideration. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion will be granted and defendant’s motions will be denied.

I

Background

Plaintiff operates a kidney dialysis center and is the assignee of the retiree health care benefits of a now-deceased patient (“the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF GA. v. City of DaltonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API