Legal Opinion

State v. Schladweiler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1989No. 16223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

In this case, the State of South Dakota appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of an indictment with prejudice. We hold (1) that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying State a continuance in order to prepare for defense pretrial motions and (2) that the trial court erred in dismissing the indictment with prejudice. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Appellees James E. Schladweiler and David Schladweiler (Schladweilers) took a truck into Dick’s Body Shop in Mitchell, South Dakota, for repair work. The repairs were made and the total amount due…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. LohnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. BingenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. BarcleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McCrarySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Springer-ErtlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. DorhoutSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API