Legal Opinion

Dinsmore v. Boyd

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM .SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Memphis. R. J. MORGAN, Cll.

1Opinion of the Court

CoorEJi,/ J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In the year 1866, the firm of Stedman Brothers & Co., then engaged in keeping the Overton Hotel in Memphis, bought, through B. B. Waddell, one of its members, in the city of New York, a large amount of furniture and fixtures for the Jiotel, partly from Henry Bruner, partly from A. T. Stewart & Co., and partly from E. V. Haughwont & Co. As a part of the contract made with each of these vendors, it was agreed that the purchasers would give a chattel mortgage on the furniture bought to secure the purchase price. Before the furniture was delivered,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VasquesTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Stephen Bernard Wlodarz v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Thomas v. DockeryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  4. Williams v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. U. S. F. & G. Co. v. ReeseTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API