Legal Opinion

Bragg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a consolidated appeal of Joan F. Bragg, Betty L. Jeanbourquin, and Richard Kitchens. Each was indicted, in a two-count indictment, for trafficking in marijuana and possession of tablets containing diazepam (Valium) and residue containing pentazocine (Talwin). Their consolidated trial resulted in Kitchens and Jeanbourquin being found guilty on both counts of the indictment and Bragg being found guilty of count two, possession of tablets containing diazepam and residue containing pentazocine. Kitchens was sentenced to 20 years in the penitentiary, 3 years' minimum mandatory confinement,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cumbo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Temple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bacot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Toney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API