McWilliams v. Garstin
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action to recover for services rendered. Judgment for plaintiff. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of El Paso County, Hon. Arthur Cornforth, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This is an action in which recovery is sought on a quantum meruit for services rendered, and also upon an oral contract for other services performed by plaintiff for defendant. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here, and applies for a supersedeas.
The principal contention of the plaintiff in error, defendant below, is to the effect that a verdict should have been directed for the defendant upon the ground “that all of the evidence shows” that the plaintiff did not perform his contract within a reasonable time. The matter of reasonable time was an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Leitensdorfer v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Cottingham v. Star Bus LineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Muhe v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Colorado Woman's College v. Bradford-Robinson Printing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Bransall v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.