Legal Opinion

Ricardo Walters v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 15, 2015No. 15-10154Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Petitioner Ricardo Walters seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) finding that he was removable as an alien convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. On appeal, Petitioner argues that he was not removable because his Florida conviction for operating a chop shop was not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. After careful review, we deny the petition for review.

I. Background

Petitioner is a native and citizen of Jamaica who was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent .resident in August 2004. In May…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abdul Itani v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Fajardo v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Keungne v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Manuel Cano v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. SALVAILBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API