Legal Opinion
Schrank v. Pearlman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 23, 1996No. 95-2642PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
683 So.2d 559 (1996)
Edward SCHRANK, Appellant,
v.
Philip PEARLMAN and Anita Pearlman, Appellees.
No. 95-2642.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 23, 1996.
Wallace Bauman Fodiman & Shannon and Michael G. Shannon and Todd A. Fodiman, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Sanford Z. Chevlin, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
COPE, Judge.
Edward Schrank appeals a partial summary judgment determining that he is liable to Philip Pearlman and Anita Pearlman. The principal question presented is the length of the statute of limitations in a suit for equitable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Gulf Life Insurance v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Love v. GibsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1849
- Meckler v. WeissSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Wilcox v. AtkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Southern-Owners Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- TRG-Brickell Point NE, Ltd. v. WajsblatDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Southern-Owners Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
- Helmet House Corp. v. StoddardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Abundant Living Citi Church, Inc. v. Abundant Living Ministries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.