Legal Opinion

Rathborne v. Hatch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1904No. 1Published

Appeal by the defendant, Edward Hatch, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 21st day of May, 1903, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Trial Term, a jury having been waived.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

• The complaint alleges that between the 1st day of January, 1899, and the 10th day of March, 1900, the firm of C. L. Rathborne & Co., at the request of the defendant, and upon his promise to pay them for their services in his behalf, bought and sold for and on his account at various times 900 shares of the capital stock of the Northern Pacific Railway Company and 200 shares of the capital stock of the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company and that said firm of C. L. Rathborne & Co. paid out and advanced, for and on behalf of the defendant on such transactions had with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Rathborne v. HatchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API