Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Way School District No. 210 v. Vinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2011No. 84243-4Published

1DissentJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶38 (dissenting) — The paramount duty of the State is to make ample provision for the education of all children. Wash. Const, art. IX, § 1. The implementation of this duty falls to local school districts, which must protect students as well as provide for their education. Consequently, school districts must take action when teachers mistreat students or otherwise fail in their duties.19 Such action may include discharge from employment.

¶39 Mr. David Vinson, a former teacher in the Federal Way School District (District), mistreated a student and failed to meet his duties as a teacher. He…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Clarke v. Shoreline School District No. 412Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hoagland v. Mount Vernon School District No. 320Washington Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API