Peoria Corp. v. Lemay

The court today dismisses Jacque Lemay’s [Lemay] renewed (second) appeal as 'premature. It correctly reasons that, because the exhibit attached to her amended petition in error — an unfiled December 10, 1993 order denying her postjudgment vacation quest— does not appear of record below, the court is without reviewing cognizance of this case. I write separately to explain that Lemay’s effort to secure corrective relief is prosecuted from a non-appealdble nisi prius ruling — one that, though in writing, is not on file1 below.

The September 21, 1993 default judgment in this cause is now clearly…