Legal Opinion

Polack v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 18, 1946No. (C. D. 1030)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States arising at the port of New Orleans by protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise invoiced as raw hog hair at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 1507 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as “Bristles, sorted, bunched, or prepared.” Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is entitled to free entry under paragraph 1637 as “Bristles, crude, not sorted, bunched, or prepared.”

At the trial plaintiff offered in evidence a sample of the merchandise which he stated was representative of the goods as they were received. The sample, marked…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Bristle & Hair Drawing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API