E.D.M., Matter Of
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
This is an appeal from the juvenile court’s order waiving jurisdiction over the appellant and transferring him to the criminal district court for criminal proceedings. The appellant, E.D.M., was charged by petition in the juvenile court with capital murder. The juvenile court waived its jurisdiction and transferred the appellant for trial as an adult in the district court. We affirm.
Admonishments
In point of error one, the appellant contends the court erred in transferring his case to the criminal district court without admonishing the appellant of his rights as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- In re G.F.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- In re G. B. B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- U.S. Tire-Tech, Inc. v. Boeran, B.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- In the Matter of C.D.T., III, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Matter of N.M.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Matter of B.N.E.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Christus Health v. Rosalinda Ragsdale, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.