Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Altoona Pipe & Steel Supply Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 2, 1972No. Nos. 71-1434 to 71-1437PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
Essentially, this is an example of a not uncommon dispute between an “out” stockholder and an “in” stockholder of a closely held corporation. It manifests itself in two actions in the district court by the “out” stockholder. She seeks to compel an inspection of the corporate records under 15 P.S. § 1308, subd. B (1968), (Penna.), which provides:
“B. Every shareholder shall, upon written demand under oath stating the purpose thereof, have a right to examine in person or by agent or attorney, during the usual hours for business for any proper purpose, the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Arlene A. Friedman v. Altoona Pipe and Steel Supply Company, Inc., a Corporation, in No. 71-1434, and Fred A. Pechter. Appeal of Fred A. Pechter, in No. 71-1435. Arlene A. Friedman v. Alpen Associates, Inc., a Corporation, in No. 71-1436, and Fred A. Pechter. Appeal of Fred A. Pechter, in No. 71-1437Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Ackerman, E. v. Kasual Computing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- McGuire v. Lord Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2021