Legal Opinion

Harry Peoples v. George Bowen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 17, 1986No. 85-7047PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Chief Judge:

This habeas case presents an unusual situation. A prisoner is erroneously given a 20-year sentence when he should have been given a mandatory sentence of life or 99 years. His counsel, who is unaware that life or 99 years is mandatory, takes a “no merit” appeal, and the appellate court, on its own motion, vacates the 20-year sentence and orders that the prisoner be resen-tenced. The trial court then sentences him to life. We hold that the federal district court erred in denying the writ.

I. TRIAL, APPEAL AND RESENTENCE

Peoples, an Alabama state prisoner, was convicted May…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louis Matire v. Louie WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Jefferson v. TerryDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API