Harry Peoples v. George Bowen
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Chief Judge:
This habeas case presents an unusual situation. A prisoner is erroneously given a 20-year sentence when he should have been given a mandatory sentence of life or 99 years. His counsel, who is unaware that life or 99 years is mandatory, takes a “no merit” appeal, and the appellate court, on its own motion, vacates the 20-year sentence and orders that the prisoner be resen-tenced. The trial court then sentences him to life. We hold that the federal district court erred in denying the writ.
I. TRIAL, APPEAL AND RESENTENCE
Peoples, an Alabama state prisoner, was convicted May…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louis Matire v. Louie WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Jefferson v. TerryDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007