Legal Opinion

Ultramar Co. v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The defendant Minerals Separation, Limited, has moved to vacate the service upon it of the summons and complaint herein, on the ground that it is a foreign corporation not doing business within the State, and that, therefore, the court has no jurisdiction of its person. The action is brought, not only against the moving defendant, which is a British corporation, but also against Minerals Separation North American Corporation, a Maryland corporation, which does not dispute that it is doing business within the State. The action is brought upon a contract negotiated by the British corporation in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. . Queen Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Colonial Trust Co. v. Montello Brick WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SteinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. In Re McBrideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Stark v. Howe Sound Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. P. H. Carlyon, Inc. v. Roberts, New York County Courts1946
  5. People ex rel. Terminals & Transporation Corp. of America v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API