Devona Ferrel v. Ann Brown, Seattle District Director of Internal Revenue Timothy A. Towns, Chief, Collection Branch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
We have carefully reviewed the record and the district court’s decision. We affirm for the reasons fully explicated in the district court’s excellent published opinion —Ferrel v. Brown, 847 F.Supp. 1524 (W.D.Wash.1993). We adopt that opinion as our own.
Ferrel does raise one issue that was mentioned in her complaint but was not decided in the district court’s opinion. She asserts that the levy on her account violated 26 U.S.C. § 6331(f) because it was uneconomical. However, that section has no relevance to this case because “§ 6331 ... does not ‘implicate the rights of third parties’....”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ferrel v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allied/royal Parking L.P., a Limited Partnership Robert Silberman Bruce Silberman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Soghomonian v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999
- Ludtke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- PEOPLE OF CAL. EX REL. ERVIN v. District DirectorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Bell Consumers, Inc. v. LayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.