Legal Opinion

Tennessee Bonding Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1942No. 8864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The judgment against the appellant was upon the bail bond in a criminal case, conditioned upon the appearance of the defendant therein upon a given date. The condition was breached and the defendant thereafter rearrested and a finding made by the District Judge that the default of the principal was wilful.

The contention that the subsequent rearrest of the defendant avoids the obligation of the bond must be rejected. Likewise must be rejected the contention that the bail bond may not be forfeited after such rearrest; Therefore, upon the authority of United States v. Costello, 6 Cir., 47 F.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. ZarafonitisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API