Legal Opinion
City of Williston v. Hegstad
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1997No. Criminal 960173PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Glen D. Hegstad appealed from a judgment of conviction for being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of at least ten one-hundredths of one percent, in violation of a Williston ordinance. Because the prosecuting attorney gave improper closing argument, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
[¶ 2] Mark McNamee, a Williston police officer, testified that on December 30, 1995, he was directed to investigate a vehicle parked in front of the Salvation Army building. When he arrived, he saw a parked van with the engine…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. EvansNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BurkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. EbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.