Legal Opinion

Weber v. Interbel Telephone Cooperative, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2003No. 02-517PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Appellants Frederick Weber and Mooseweb Corporation (collectively “Mooseweb”) filed a Complaint in Montana’s Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, alleging, among other things, that Respondent InterBel Telephone Cooperative, Inc. (“InterBel”) acted ultra vires by providing dial-up Internet access services to its customers. Mooseweb and InterBel filed cross motions for summary judgment. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of InterBel and Mooseweb appeals. We affirm the District Court.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether InterBel acted ultra vires and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lemont Land Corp. v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kolar v. BergoMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Fliehler v. Uninsured Employers FundMontana Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Kostelecky v. Peas in a PodMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Kipfinger v. G.F. ObstetricalMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  4. JRN Holdings v. Dearborn MeadowsMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Willems v. SEC. of State LindMontana Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API