Legal Opinion

Ladson v. Mostowitz

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 17, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Gary, J., Beaufort, February, 1895. Action in claim and delivery on the following complaint: I. That the plaintiffs, Alice Badson, Susanna Badson, Mary Badson, Buey Badson, Joseph Badson, and Baurena Badson, are infants under the age of twenty-one years. II. That on the 2d day of July, 1894, at Beaufort, S. C., the said Kate Badson was duly appointed by the judge of probate of this county guardian of said infant plaintiffs for the purposes of this action. III.

Read the full summary

Before Gary, J., Beaufort, February, 1895. Action in claim and delivery on the following complaint: I. That the plaintiffs, Alice Badson, Susanna Badson, Mary Badson, Buey Badson, Joseph Badson, and Baurena Badson, are infants under the age of twenty-one years. II. That on the 2d day of July, 1894, at Beaufort, S. C., the said Kate Badson was duly appointed by the judge of probate of this county guardian of said infant plaintiffs for the purposes of this action. III. That at the times hereinafter mentioned the plaintiffs were and still are the owners of one bay mare, called Clara, worth $100,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of -the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action for claim and delivery of certain personal property. The defendant, Prime White, demurred to the complaint, which, together with appellant’s exceptions, will be incorporated in the report of the case, on the ground that it appears upon the face of the complaint that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him.

The- defendant, Mostowitz, answered, but at the trial, before reading his answer, interposed an oral demurrer to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Welborn v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Young v. Corbitt Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Bingham v. Harby & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Robert R. Sizer & Co. v. DopsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Chestnut v. SalesMontana Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API