Legal Opinion
Charles H. Keating v. Robert Hood Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1999No. 98-55468Published
1Opinion of the Court
191 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 1999)
CHARLES H. KEATING, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT HOOD; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
No. 98-55468
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted November 5, 1998
September 16, 1999
Amended October, 1999
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Sanjay T. Kumar, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for the respondents-appellants.
Scott D. Devereaux and Stephen C. Neal, Cooley Godward, Palo Alto, California, for the petitioner-appellee.
Andrew R. McGaan, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Illinois, for the petitioner-appellee.
Appeal…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.