Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 30, 1999No. 22759-2-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

Otto Allen Ross, Jr. appeals his conviction of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, arguing that the trial court violated CrR 3.3, 1 the speedy trial rule. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

On June 7, 1997, a Washington State Patrol trooper arrested Ross for driving under the influence (DUI). During a search of Ross’s vehicle incident to his arrest, the trooper discovered what he believed to be methamphetamine. Ross stated that the substance was “crank,” a street term for methamphetamine, and that he had ingested some of it by “snorting” it approximately two hours earlier.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. FladeboWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. TrafnyUtah Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DeSantiagoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. State v. DeSantiagoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. State v. KindsvogelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State Of Washington v. Mary T. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API