State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
Otto Allen Ross, Jr. appeals his conviction of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, arguing that the trial court violated CrR 3.3, 1 the speedy trial rule. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
On June 7, 1997, a Washington State Patrol trooper arrested Ross for driving under the influence (DUI). During a search of Ross’s vehicle incident to his arrest, the trooper discovered what he believed to be methamphetamine. Ross stated that the substance was “crank,” a street term for methamphetamine, and that he had ingested some of it by “snorting” it approximately two hours earlier.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FladeboWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. TrafnyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DeSantiagoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. DeSantiagoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. KindsvogelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State Of Washington v. Mary T. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2022