Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The asserted errors in the charge to the jury, if errors they were, have not been preserved by proper protest for our review. We find no error in the failure of the People to produce the informer-witness. The identity of the informer, who was not an eyewitness to the criminal transactions, was disclosed to defense counsel. His disappearance six months before trial had not been procured by the People, and the trial court found acceptable the efforts made by the People in response to defendant’s midtrial…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Village of Monticello, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Kennedy v. Upper Milford Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. People v. McKinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Kennedy v. UPPER MILFORD TP. ZHBSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. People v. MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API